From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 2 18:17:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E14FC5C; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 18:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EEA8FC08; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 18:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB2IHFaR031531; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:17:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qB2IGq7G044788; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:16:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Subject: Re: Is cross-world building broken? From: Ian Lepore To: Garrett Cooper In-Reply-To: <4DB7FB56-359B-42DA-BB6F-0F4F33C772C5@gmail.com> References: <6961B0D9-F823-415C-A105-7DAC8339CB30@gmail.com> <3EB9F7EB-D9C8-40CB-BF28-21B7BE59C94C@gmail.com> <20121128071252.7AC1958094@chaos.jnpr.net> <20121128231538.8AB6758094@chaos.jnpr.net> <20121129000106.540ED58094@chaos.jnpr.net> <1354288503.69940.410.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20121130173656.9A9BE58094@chaos.jnpr.net> <1354299267.69940.434.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <4DB7FB56-359B-42DA-BB6F-0F4F33C772C5@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:16:52 -0700 Message-ID: <1354472212.1140.5.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Turner , Adrian Chadd , FreeBSD Current , "Simon J. Gerraty" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:17:35 -0000 On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 14:16 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Nov 30, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 09:36 -0800, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:15:03 -0700, Ian Lepore writes: > >>> So when did this break, and why can't it be fixed? I've been using > >> > >> Sorry I missed the begining of this thread, > >> is anything broken? > > Apparently the only thing that's broken is the original implication in this mail thread that something is broken, and also the advice that DESTDIR must not be specified on a make command line for targets other than installworld, installkernel, or distribute. (To be fair, the original was more of a question, but then what followed were replies that reinforced an implication that something is really wrong.) I finally got updated with -current this morning and I find that my cross-build scripts which just blindly always pass DESTDIR= on the make command line regardless of the targets being built still work fine, like they always have. > > I haven't experienced anything myself, I assumed because I've been too > > busy to update any of my -current sandboxes for weeks. I was just going > > by the earlier messages in this thread, which were roughly > > > > "A cross-build breaks early in the process if DESTDIR is set" > > > > followed by > > > > "DESTDIR must only be set for installworld, buildworld, and distribute > > targets." > > s/buildworld/installkernel/ Oops, indeed; sorry for contributing to the confusion. -- Ian