From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 23 03:34:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1264116A41F for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:34:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AEA43D48 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:34:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: from tirun (dsl093-061-215.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.61.215]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE247A for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:34:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050723033251.GB45516@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <42E03812.4090801@elischer.org> <20050723033251.GB45516@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:34:44 -0400 Message-Id: <1122089684.12033.0.camel@tirun> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: libcipher replacement X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:34:48 -0000 On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:32 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:04:34PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I have snet this mail 3 times and each time it never appeared on the list > > (that I saw.. I think it got eaten by a spam filtrer somewhere..) > > > > trying again. > > > > Since setkey(3) has now gone away so thoroughly that there is not even > > a manual page saying how to replace it, > > I need to port some code that uses it.. > > > > What is the suggested replacement? > > > > Of course it is still on linux.. apparently in libcrypt. > > but that doesn't help me keep this code on BSD.. > > > > I've seen each of your previous post. Perhaps, you need > to adjust your local mail filtering. Likewise. As to answers, I strongly suspect the openssl in base is the approved replacement. -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ. KF8NH