Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:47:01 +0200
From:      Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To:        Denis Peplin <den@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] handbook/firewalls: rewrite warning
Message-ID:  <20050216154701.GI2971@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
In-Reply-To: <42136211.9080908@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <42136211.9080908@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--WkHPBKJ2pKcVUM5H
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Denis Peplin wrote:
> Hello!
>=20
> Some parts of handbook's firewall chapter still
> can mislead some users.
>=20
> Patch (attached) mostly obtained from security
> chapter, rev. 1.229
>=20
> I will apply this small patch to current firewalls
> sections after 2 days, if no objections.
>=20
> Thanks!

> Index: firewalls/chapter.sgml
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /home/dcvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls/chapter=
=2Esgml,v
> retrieving revision 1.34
> diff -u -r1.34 chapter.sgml
> --- firewalls/chapter.sgml	15 Feb 2005 15:09:42 -0000	1.34
> +++ firewalls/chapter.sgml	16 Feb 2005 14:59:10 -0000
> @@ -950,13 +950,12 @@
>           sets and is the only rule set type covered herein.</para>
> =20
>         <warning>
> -         <para>When working with the firewall rules, always,
> -           always do it on the console of the system running the
> -           firewall or you can end up locking your self out.
> -	   Alternatively, you may setup a cronjob to flush the
> -	   firewall rules say every five minutes.
> -	   This may not be acceptable for a corporate firewall,
> -	   but should be ok for a home firewall.</para>
> +         <para>When working with the firewall rules, be
> +	   <emphasis>very careful</emphasis>.  Some configurations
> +	   <emphasis>will lock yourself out</emphasis> of the server.

Errr.. shouldn't that be 'will lock *you* out'? :)

Other than that, no objections here - and the original text did indeed
need some clarification :)

G'luck,
Peter

--=20
Peter Pentchev	roam@ringlet.net    roam@cnsys.bg    roam@FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
If this sentence were in Chinese, it would say something else.

--WkHPBKJ2pKcVUM5H
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCE2r17Ri2jRYZRVMRAt9BAJ4g/LuP9RGEJ7+1iEWMcbtaChU/rwCcCrWO
lXc45beskspNXMYEj0qv8Y4=
=UNtv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--WkHPBKJ2pKcVUM5H--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050216154701.GI2971>