From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Aug 7 18: 5: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEA037B401 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 18:04:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from parv@worldnet.att.net) Received: from worldnet.att.net ([32.100.199.86]) by mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP id <20010808010457.ZVIK5127.mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net@worldnet.att.net>; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 01:04:57 +0000 Received: by worldnet.att.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6F0B950BC6; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 21:04:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 21:04:55 -0400 From: parv To: John Galt Cc: f-q Subject: Re: how is mail secure when only signed? Message-ID: <20010807210455.A43613@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: John Galt , f-q References: <20010807023118.A47821@moo.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from galt@inconnu.isu.edu on Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 04:45:10PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG this was, on the fateful occasion around Aug 07 18:45 -0400, sent by John Galt > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, parv wrote: > > >i am curious as why would some people, thus software, would consider a > >plain text mail which is only signed, not encrypted, w/ public key of > >some encryption scheme as secure? ... > > http://world.std.com/~dtd/sign_encrypt/sign_encrypt7.html > > It's not. This was discussed on one of the securityfocus mailinglists a > while ago. thanks john for the link; it's massive but i think i will be able to digest it ... by chewing very slowly... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message