From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 11:46:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB2116A4B3 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.nersc.gov (mx2.nersc.gov [128.55.6.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6C243F93 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:46:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dart@nersc.gov) Received: from mx2.nersc.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.nersc.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097D17762 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gemini.nersc.gov (gemini.nersc.gov [128.55.16.111]) by mx2.nersc.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id B082B7747 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gemini.nersc.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gemini.nersc.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98733F8EB for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:46:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:00:13 EDT. <20031021140013.47D17C6C538@guns.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1682077037P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:46:01 -0700 From: Eli Dart Message-Id: <20031021184601.98733F8EB@gemini.nersc.gov> Subject: Re: SACK? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:46:07 -0000 --==_Exmh_1682077037P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In reply to Mark Allman : > > Hi folks! > > Are there any plans to incorporate SACK in FreeBSD? It'd sure be > handy for me to have (I prefer the *BSDs, and, alas, they are the > only remaining SACK-less systems worth mentioning). I think there > are research implementations that could be used as a basis (Luigi > Rizzo did one, I think.). Any thoughts in this area? In fact, OpenBSD has SACK -- this narrows the Field of the SACK-less to FreeBSD and NetBSD..... --eli > > Thanks! > > allman > > > -- > Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --==_Exmh_1682077037P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE/lX7pLTFEeF+CsrMRAlfRAJ4psX1XLptuLL8oYu7ceUz03A1njQCeNFzs QcbsZ+Dvi42WjyFNZ8kxGjY= =jfXr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1682077037P--