From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 23:36:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D110416A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:36:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8069C43D39 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:36:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90BCB8FA for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:36:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59077-01 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:36:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AC0B8F8 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:36:25 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:36:17 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1147794.2EmFa64baP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411021736.21034.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 23:36:26 -0000 --nextPart1147794.2EmFa64baP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 02 November 2004 16:20, Kris Kennaway wrote: > (there are at least 350 ports that emit warnings about aliasing, and would > probably have runtime errors when compiled with -O2; moreover, a number of > ports fail to even build with -O2). =20 Out of curiosity, are those ports like to have equivalents in Gentoo's=20 "portage" system? Those guys love to build with -O310 -fomit-instructions= =20 but their stuff seems to pretty much work. Why do we seem to have so many= =20 problems with (presumably?) the same software on our system? IANA compiler designer so I don't really understand a lot of the technical= =20 details, but is this something that can be reasonably understood by=20 somewhat experienced application programmers? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1147794.2EmFa64baP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBBiBn05sRg+Y0CpvERAo+EAJ99EijGJOh32vAiRjTNGLhMquAeKwCgnuIs SYyF9X8feFDN4Qj/3G8IibE= =4w3P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1147794.2EmFa64baP--