Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:57:14 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Matthias Apitz <matthias.apitz@oclc.org> Cc: Vince Hoffman <jhary@unsane.co.uk>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: downloading video from http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=... Message-ID: <20080213165253.A2992@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080213154828.GA10843@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20080213150712.GA9811@rebelion.Sisis.de> <47B31027.3080104@unsane.co.uk> <20080213154828.GA10843@rebelion.Sisis.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> $ youtube-dl 'http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=7540047147367608928' > Error: URL does not seem to be a youtube video URL. If it is, report a bug. > $ > > i.e. youtube-dl is for YouTube (and works for me), but not for Google > > thx anyway > stupid question. how much does the high-speed connection cost in USA? i mean something in Gbits/s range which is about how much google or youtube needs. of course cheaper than in Poland, possibly worlds cheapest, but still expensive. what i mean: doing things the way preventing any caching (or just downloading file and then playing many times) costs lots of bandwidth==money, but do not give (in theory) gives money. i'm sure that youtube or google owners are not idiots, so the question is - how this practice is making money for them - more than lost for bandwidth?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080213165253.A2992>