From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 06:25:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A534610657BB; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 06:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from u18-124.dslaccess.de (unknown [194.231.39.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F2F8FC27; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 06:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.20.1.100] (unknown [172.20.1.100]) by u18-124.dslaccess.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A089F2060A; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:25:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D2AA738.6020104@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:29:12 +0100 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev References: <201101092101.p09L1TEt092060@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110110013403.GA92966@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110110013403.GA92966@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Olli Hauer , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils Makefile ports/sysutils/zfs-periodic Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-message X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 06:25:13 -0000 On 2011-01-10 02:34, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 09:01:29PM +0000, Olli Hauer wrote: >> ohauer 2011-01-09 21:01:29 UTC >> >> Modified files: >> sysutils Makefile >> Added files: >> sysutils/zfs-periodic Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-message >> Log: >> Scripts that uses the the periodic system to create and manage zfs >> snapshots. Easily configured via /etc/periodic.conf > > I wonder how is this substantially different from already existing > sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt and sysutils/zfsnap. I was even looking what's the difference. - zfs-snapshot-mgmt *needy ruby* and use crontab - zfsnap pure *shell script* but seems preferred for command line usage - zfs-periodic pure *shell script* designed for periodic In my opinion the closest match for zfs-periodic is sysutils/freebsd-snapshot http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/snapshot/ > Maybe we should consider putting some ZFS snapshot management scripts in > the base to discourage people to come up with their own numerous versions. Yes, but aren't you lucky if you find a port which completes the OS? Have you ever written a PR for freebsd-rc? You will wait until the end of your live before you get a feedback. Ports are mostly the faster way.