From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 15:50:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD29106566B; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 15:50:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF3E8FC13; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 15:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA22586; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:50:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4D6E6758.3050704@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:50:48 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101213 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Varga References: <4D6E558B.5090706@freebsd.org> <1299078805.52738.15.camel@xenon> <1299079125.52738.16.camel@xenon> In-Reply-To: <1299079125.52738.16.camel@xenon> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, multimedia@freebsd.org, mkbosmans@gmail.com Subject: Re: pulseaudio: module.c: module-detect is deprecated: Please use module-udev-detect instead of module-detect! X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:50:55 -0000 on 02/03/2011 17:18 Michal Varga said the following: > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 16:13 +0100, Michal Varga wrote: >> So instead of fixing things like these in ports, I'd say the issue >> should be reported/fix submitted to upstream, it's pretty much possible >> that they don't even know that there are systems that don't run evdev >> (note that I don't mean it offensively, more like speaking generally >> from experience, it simply happens). >> > > Eh, I meant udev of course, I guess that's enough coffee for me today. That's possible, of course. Another possibility is that they think that everything is Linux, or everything is like Linux, or they don't care about not Linux. I am all for contacting them, for sure. Just want to point out that the proposed patch would not be against the nature of the ports, because it doesn't affect functionality, but addresses OS differences. -- Andriy Gapon