From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 16 21:04:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AABB16A41C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:04:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D3D43D1F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:04:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5GL44Jx035283 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:04:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j5GL44HU035282 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:04:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:04:04 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050616210404.GM33118@bunrab.catwhisker.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Wolfskill , current@freebsd.org References: <20050615061009.GA11914@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <001501c5720b$aceb84d0$0b2a15ac@SMILEY> <20050616164747.GB21733@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20050616.142507.85367515.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050616205033.GF13900@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050616205033.GF13900@odin.ac.hmc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: HEADSUP: OpenBSD dhclient incoming X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:04:05 -0000 On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:50:33PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > ... > Agreed. There's actually some demand for a default for wired interfaces > as well. If nothing else I know the EmuLab people would like one > so they didn't have to use their own scripts to configure all the > interfaces. I've thought about it a bit. I'm leaning towards a > default_ifconfig variable plus a new magic ifconfig_ option NONE to > cause the default option not to be used. >From the perspective that NIC-specific variables are of the form "ifconfig_${NIC}" (e.g., ifconfig_lo0; ifconfig_ed0; ifconfig_xl0), might it make at least as much sense to call it "ifconfig_default" (or something similar)? Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Any given sequence of letters is a misspelling of a great many English words. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for public key.