Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:43:07 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: importing gdtoa Message-ID: <200302212043.h1LKh7NG014904@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030221201031.GB59752@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <20030221085508.GA55786@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030221203916.A40755@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <200302211820.h1LIKHhQ013553@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20030221201031.GB59752@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:10:31 -0800, David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> said: [I wrote:] >> We are supposed, I believe, to support arbitrary national digits in >> these functions, in addition to the Portable Character Set digits. > revision 1.15 > date: 2001/11/29 03:03:52; author: ache; state: Exp; lines: +24 -24 > Back out national digits support, POSIX explicetely disallows it: Ache is wrong. See XSH page 1442 line 44650: # In other than the C or POSIX locales, other implementation-defined # subject sequences may be accepted. The same dispensation is provided for strtol() on page 1449 and for strtoul() on page 1454. However, I was mistaken in that this does not represent a requirement on our part. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302212043.h1LKh7NG014904>