From owner-cvs-all Mon Apr 13 02:15:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA11054 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 02:15:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from csvax.cs.caltech.edu (csvax.cs.caltech.edu [131.215.131.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id CAA11049 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 02:15:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mika@stun4p.cs.caltech.edu) Received: from stun4p.cs.caltech.edu by csvax.cs.caltech.edu (4.1/1.34.1) id AA25216; Mon, 13 Apr 98 02:15:55 PDT Received: from localhost.cs.caltech.edu (localhost.cs.caltech.edu [127.0.0.1]) by stun4p.cs.caltech.edu (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA07614 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 02:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804130915.CAA07614@stun4p.cs.caltech.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: stun4p.cs.caltech.edu: Host localhost.cs.caltech.edu [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: bin/6231 and bin/4678 Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 02:15:55 -0700 From: Mika Nystrom Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi Committers, We've now been using the patches in bin/6231 and bin/4678 for two weeks and about six months, respectively, on production systems. Both patches fix (in our application) critical problems in amd. bin/6231 is almost certainly the right solution to its problem (and could be committed w/o further ado), but bin/4678 is a bit of a kludge, and might need some more analysis (I don't know for sure what your standards are :)) Mika Nystrom Dept. of Computer Science California Institute of Technology To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message