From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 10 19:53:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E088216A40F for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (mxfep02.bredband.com [195.54.107.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D194243D72 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:52:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from moria.endor.swagman.org ([213.113.4.185] [213.113.4.185]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20060910191516.CMKB12418.mxfep02.bredband.com@moria.endor.swagman.org> for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:15:16 +0200 Received: from rivendell (rivendell.endor.swagman.org [192.168.10.10]) by moria.endor.swagman.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B993CC for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 22:14:55 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <00c301c6d50d$751ffe80$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> From: "Reko Turja" To: References: <20060909182831.GA32004@FS.denninger.net><200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org><20060910150526.GA31323@FS.denninger.net><20060910151817.H8856@psg.com><20060910181331.GA35166@FS.denninger.net><20060910183631.GA6406@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060910183958.GA35701@FS.denninger.net> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 22:15:20 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:53:09 -0000 From: "Karl Denninger" To: Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 9:39 PM > Yes it is, in the general case; in any event if you track RELENG_6_1 > you will > get no bug fixes in general - security related items to filter back > down but > in general bug reports posted against a -RELEASE are, if addressed, > put into > -STABLE. You would like untested fixes to hit the release version first? By the way, possible breakage of STABLE due MFC process was announced a good while ago... -Reko