From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 26 7:36: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from proxy2.ba.best.com (proxy2.ba.best.com [206.184.139.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0976537B401 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 07:36:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott@renfro.org) Received: from renfro.org (dynamic30.pm01.san-jose.best.com [209.24.164.30]) by proxy2.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.out) with ESMTP id HAA06628; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 07:33:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (from scott@localhost) by renfro.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f1QFY0604541; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 07:34:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 07:34:00 -0800 From: Scott Renfro To: Soren Schmidt Cc: Scott Renfro , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Richard Johnson Subject: Re: ata-disk ioctl and atactl patch Message-ID: <20010226073400.A4517@bonsai.home.renfro.org> References: <20010225194120.A64003@bonsai.home.renfro.org> <200102260728.IAA43029@freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200102260728.IAA43029@freebsd.dk>; from sos@freebsd.dk on Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:28:56AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:28:56AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > No its not safe at all, you risk trashing an already running command... Thanks for the feedback; that's exactly what I was concerned about. > Anyhow, I have an atacontrol thingy in the works for attach/detach, > raid control etc, etc, I'll try to merge this functionality into that > (the ioctl's will change etc, but the functionality is nice)... Great. thanks again, -scott -- Scott Renfro +1 650 906 9618 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message