Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Jun 2001 03:55:37 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: sysorg: sys/modules 
Message-ID:  <200106151055.f5FAtbm10056@mass.dis.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jun 2001 20:30:20 %2B1000." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106152016001.83734-100000@besplex.bde.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It wouldn't be worth it even if it were right.  Hopefully the new build
> system will put all the object files in the same directory, like they
> are for static kernel builds.

This pushes us back to a single filename namespace, which is less than a 
wonderful idea. 8(

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106151055.f5FAtbm10056>