From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 10 19:51:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AFB389 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:51:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@getmail.no) Received: from smtp.getmail.no (smtp.getmail.no [84.208.15.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EC967B for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:51:26 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Received: from get-mta-scan04.get.basefarm.net ([10.5.16.4]) by get-mta-out01.get.basefarm.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-0.04 64bit (built Jun 20 2008)) with ESMTP id <0ML100JSJZ1JBG00@get-mta-out01.get.basefarm.net> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:51:19 +0200 (MEST) Received: from get-mta-scan04.get.basefarm.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id 267811F054CD_165B4A7B for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:51:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kg-v2.kg4.no (cm-84.215.180.206.getinternet.no [84.215.180.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by get-mta-scan04.get.basefarm.net (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTPSA id 7C7FD1F054CA_165B4A6F for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:51:18 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:51:18 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fusefs-kmod does not work on 8-STABLE? Message-id: <20130410205118.72ade1f6495310e84226551b@getmail.no> In-reply-to: References: <20130410052710.GA36137@regency.nsu.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:51:26 -0000 On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:33:10 -0500 Mark Felder wrote: > FUSE is pretty bad outside of FreeBSD 10 where it's rewritten and part of > the kernel. If your environment would be OK with making the leap to > FreeBSD 10 I'd recommend it. Ate there any bugreports or known problems? Except for one machine (see this thread[1]), it works fine (good enough) for me on a number of FreeBSD machines, and have done so for some years now. I haven't tested fusefs much under FreeBSD 9.0 and newer, I mostly use it with FreeBSD 8.x. I'm only using sshfs and gphotofs. References: 1) http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=37302 -- Torfinn Ingolfsen