From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 23 20:06:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46060106566B for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58D88FC0A for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p8NK6oob068427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:06:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p8NK6oob068427 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1316808410; bh=V12tBpXzdE3IJKqZEGy23lf11WH8kFyTeN75/juZKFQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E7CE6D9.7040004@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20F ri,=2023=20Sep=202011=2021:06:49=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.2)=20Gecko/2 0110902=20Thunderbird/6.0.2|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20David=20Brod beck=20|CC:=20FreeBSD=20Questions=20|Subject:=20Re:=20much=20to=20my=20surprise....|Ref erences:=20<201109222014.p8MKEobt083145@mail.r-bonomi.com>=20<4B62 F4A4-4B49-4CB5-91F1-A3C3E624251F@d3photography.com>=20<20110923000 837.GD7704@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk>=20<4E7C31D6.1040404@infra caninophile.co.uk>=20|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:=201. 3.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=2 0micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signatur e"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigD59DB45960A1AD02DDB1A977 "; b=MlttlUQIdtHu8/R+JlAyHiZBy3yaqQVhj1CgJewWctvbiOzQhfLvv0aSCu5Jj6Ah2 sVXuQnDD4MVYWv6dql1qau70fwfu3xwBSXwO7BLcGacBJmRwBTKQZy0pDc3QQmrdRu SKAFIkD60UVDSIsyKtkj707C3at50efmZxuOGHY0= Message-ID: <4E7CE6D9.7040004@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:06:49 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Brodbeck References: <201109222014.p8MKEobt083145@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4B62F4A4-4B49-4CB5-91F1-A3C3E624251F@d3photography.com> <20110923000837.GD7704@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4E7C31D6.1040404@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD59DB45960A1AD02DDB1A977" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: much to my surprise.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:06:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD59DB45960A1AD02DDB1A977 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23/09/2011 19:19, David Brodbeck wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Matthew Seaman > wrote: >> > Not my experience. Running my own DNS is simple and trouble free, p= lus >> > it gives me much more scope to play with things like DNSSEC. > I've done it before, but I don't anymore. Partly because it's very > hard to provide proper levels of DNS redundancy if you're running your > own DNS server. Not that the big players always get it right; I've > seen ones that had four authoritative servers that were all on the > same subnet. ;) Yeah. My ISP will 2ary my zones onto their much larger and diversely situated servers at no extra cost. That's pretty handy. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigD59DB45960A1AD02DDB1A977 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk585toACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyj1ACfeo9oLSJDblKoUkexZWX+ObAB awYAn13Wn2lJw2UDFrImaGtlcUcHJCSq =qSRL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD59DB45960A1AD02DDB1A977--