From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Feb 26 10:27:36 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id KAA27322 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 26 Feb 1995 10:27:36 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA27313; Sun, 26 Feb 1995 10:27:30 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: John Beukema <jbeukema@hk.super.net>
cc: Terry Lambert <terry@cs.weber.edu>, ernie@tinny.eis.net.au,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Feb 95 10:27:37 +0800."
             <Pine.SUN.3.91.950226102510.5089A-100000@is1.hk.super.net> 
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 1995 10:27:24 -0800
Message-ID: <27310.793823244@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> On Sat, 25 Feb 1995, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > 
> > To not maintain binary compatability *including* shared images would
> > be folly.
> > 
> 
> Bravo! I agree completely.  We do not need one more fragmented, 
> incompatible flavour.

Sigh.  I applaud the sentiment, gentlemen.  So.  That simply leaves the
simple question:  Which one of YOU are going to do the work involved?

						Jordan