From owner-freebsd-doc Tue May 29 10:30:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com [171.69.24.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DA437B422 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 10:30:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@cisco.com) Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id f4THUSU25887; Tue, 29 May 2001 10:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4THURD60201; Tue, 29 May 2001 10:30:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200105291730.f4THURD60201@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Dima Dorfman Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ¤t;/&stable; entities for consistent naming In-Reply-To: <20010529043401.3E2A43E0B@bazooka.unixfreak.org> References: <20010529043401.3E2A43E0B@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Comments: In-reply-to Dima Dorfman message dated "Mon, 28 May 2001 21:34:01 -0700." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_859220174P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:30:27 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==_Exmh_859220174P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Dima Dorfman wrote: > Attached is a patch which adds the entities to a new file, > share/sgml/freebsd.ent, and changes the Cutting Edge chapter of the > Handbook to use them. I like this! Question: Do we have any namespace pollution issues here; i.e. should ¤t; be something like &os.current;? Or is this not a factor? > I also added an &os; entity for the same > reasons as outlined above (although the inconsistencies here are much > less subtle). The Relnotes already have &os;, which is where I got > the idea; and I think Bruce got it from mdoc(7). Just for the record, I dreamed it up; I am too ignorant about mdoc(7) to take ideas from it, good as they are. Originally I thought it'd be good for typesetting FreeBSD in other font or whatever. Cheers, Bruce. --==_Exmh_859220174P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE7E9yy2MoxcVugUsMRAp2xAJ9JIuVdLj2GaftCsbX7J0sv7m6D1ACdEa2n weFoDk89ulsEzYZgvAZrRsk= =x1UN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_859220174P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message