From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 09:44:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B03916A400 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA69013C489 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:44:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id l3F9M1Rm030252; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:22:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3F9M00L030251; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:22:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:22:00 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Nathan Whitehorn Message-ID: <20070415092200.GA30161@alchemy.franken.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Systems with > 16 GB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:44:30 -0000 On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:50:33PM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > Does anyone know if there are currently problems booting on systems with > more than 16 GB of RAM? I noticed a note from release engineering on > 6.1-RELEASE saying this, but couldn't find any details. > > If this is true, does anyone have any theories for what is > responsible/patches? This particular todo list entry refers to the absence of bounce buffer support in iommu(4). Other than this the only other issue I'm aware of is that executing kernel modules above 4G doesn't work as also mentioned in that list. Marius