From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri Jul 31 09:55:31 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA18833
          for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from carp.gbr.epa.gov (carp.gbr.epa.gov [204.46.159.110])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA18828
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from mjenkins@carp.gbr.epa.gov)
Received: (from mjenkins@localhost)
	by carp.gbr.epa.gov (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA01710
	for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 11:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from mjenkins)
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 11:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Jenkins <mjenkins@carp.gbr.epa.gov>
Message-Id: <199807311655.LAA01710@carp.gbr.epa.gov>
To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Network Cards
In-Reply-To: <35BFA261.580E40F3@pipeline.ch>
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

If my only choice is 3c509 or 3c509b, which is a better performer?  Why?
Should the "Network Driver Optimization" be set to DOS Client, Windows or
OS/2 Client, or Server?  Does this really matter?

Thanks,
Mike

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message