From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 21 11:26:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5940416A4CE for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 11:26:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.new-wen.net (ns.new-wen.net [217.237.172.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D6343D1F for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 11:26:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from deuerl@new-wen.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by ns.new-wen.net (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) id hBLJQCkp061804 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:26:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from deuerl@new-wen.net) Received: (from httpd@localhost) by ns.new-wen.net (8.12.9p1/8.12.9av) id hBLJ22WO060869 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:02:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from deuerl@new-wen.net) X-Authentication-Warning: ns.new-wen.net: httpd set sender to deuerl@new-wen.net using -f Received: from p50884FCE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p50884FCE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.136.79.206]) by webmail.new-wen.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:02:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1072033322.3fe5ee2ab1e6f@webmail.new-wen.net> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:02:02 +0100 From: Robert Deuerling To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 / FreeBSD-5.1 X-Originating-IP: 80.136.79.206 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Subject: how to forward ports to different machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 19:26:18 -0000 Hello, i have a router running nat on interface xl1 and i want to do the following: 1.) ports 25 and 22 have to go to the router itself. 2.) only Ports 80 and 20/21 have to go to another machine. How can i manage this? Only trying to configure nat does not the job. My second thought is to run separate nat processes, fed by different ipfw rules. Any better suggestions? -Robert ------------------------------------------------- Dieser Mailservice wurde durch das Bürgernetz Neustadt-Weiden zur Verfügung gestellt