Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:09:44 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Cc:        Adam Kirchhoff <adam.k.kirchhoff@gmail.com>, simon@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE Hardware Notes is wrong.
Message-ID:  <201201191009.45027.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1201181959460.882@multics.mit.edu>
References:  <CANzk6u0y%2Be8rj=OuS=b64HLJ6QXv761ysJL%2BTaM3w30DEe35jg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1201181959460.882@multics.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:01:17 pm Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Adam Kirchhoff wrote:
> 
> > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/hardware.html
> >
> > This section is correct:
> >
> > [i386,amd64] The snd_emu10kx(4) driver supports the following sound cards:
> >> Creative Sound Blaster Live! (EMU10K1 Chipset). Both PCM and MIDI
> >> interfaces are available.
> >> Creative Sound Blaster Audigy (CA0100 and CA0101 Chipset). PCM and two
> >> MIDI interfaces available.
> >> Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 and Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 4
> >> (CA0102 Chipset). PCM support is limited to 48kHz/16 bit stereo (192kHz/24
> >> bit part of this chipset is not supported).
> >> Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Value (CA0108 Chipset). PCM support is
> >> limited to 48kHz/16 bit stereo (192kHz/24 bit part of this chipset is not
> >> supported). There is no MIDI support for this card.
> >
> >
> >
> > This section is wrong:
> >
> >
> > The snd_emu10kx(4) driver does support the following sound cards (although
> >> they have names similar to some supported ones):
> >> Creative Sound Blaster Live! 24-Bit, identified by FreeBSD as
> >> Creative Sound Blaster Audigy LS / ES, identified by FreeBSD as
> >> All other Creative sound cards with -DAT chipsets.
> >> All Creative X-Fi series sound cards.
> >
> >
> >
> > None of those cards are supported by snd_emu10kx (according to the man
> > page, and in my own personal experience). I believe a "does support" should
> > read "does not support".
> 
> Looks like the second one should be "does not support", yes.
> 
> Thanks for spotting it; hopefully I can prod a committer into making the 
> change.

The snd_emu10kx(4) manpage from which this is derived is correct.  This 
appears to be a problem with the code that parses the manpages to generate the 
hardware release notes.  Maybe it is confused by the markup:

The
.Nm
driver does
.Em not
support the following sound cards (although they have names
similar to some supported ones):

This change fixes it.  If simon ok's it I'll commit it.  It does result in
a new header line for malo(4) making it into the hardware notes (it may be that
the malo(4) manpage needs to format it's hardware table differently anyway).

Index: release/doc/share/misc/man2hwnotes.pl
===================================================================
--- man2hwnotes.pl	(revision 230267)
+++ man2hwnotes.pl	(working copy)
@@ -324,6 +324,11 @@ sub parse {
 	    } elsif (/^Fx/) {
 		dlog(3, "Got Fx command");
 		parabuf_addline(\%mdocvars, "FreeBSD");
+	    } elsif (/^Em (.+)$/) {
+		my ($txt, $punct_str) = split_punct_chars($1);
+
+		parabuf_addline(\%mdocvars,
+				normalize("<emphasis>$txt</emphasis>$punct_str"));
 	    } else {
 		# Ignore all other commands.
 		dlog(3, "Ignoring unknown command $cmd");

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201201191009.45027.jhb>