Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 18:46:44 -0400 From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting a stable MAC address for a RPI CM3+ with ue0 interface Message-ID: <503e32c4-d352-addd-930d-e47ca94d8f29@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <4BC49AD6-10DA-407C-B239-5F637CEA094C@hausen.com> References: <3C1032FF-B914-4863-8A03-759A8B4BE216@hausen.com> <77E70D30-8E7D-42DC-A041-3A783E1C6908@yahoo.com> <5205C76E-BAB4-4AB7-8A03-1E8A2D4353BB@hausen.com> <B50A4409-84C0-405D-8099-43692243AE52@hausen.com> <84C20AD4-1F37-414E-8808-60A2C9B621D9@karels.net> <4BC49AD6-10DA-407C-B239-5F637CEA094C@hausen.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/20/23 16:09, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi Mike, > >> Am 20.09.2023 um 22:02 schrieb Mike Karels <mike@karels.net>: >> [...] [quoting someone else who said:] >>> I though that the Pi was *the* aarch64 platform, >>> at least in numbers ... >> >> In numbers, probably. In support, no. > > Puzzled - which platform is? > [...] I sort of asked this question on the mailing list last year [I asked, "Which ARM platform will give the least angst for a FreeBSD user?"] and the consensus then seemed to be the RockPRO 64. -- George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?503e32c4-d352-addd-930d-e47ca94d8f29>