Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:52:58 +0100 From: Igor Mozolevsky <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: llvm/clang a tool chain or just a compiler for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <a2b6592c0907220852h4eba5c6bpdebe1d7dcd7ef94a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090722141756.GQ55190@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <2e566b9e0907202134h5568a06bl33a8d95ac9c7f845@mail.gmail.com> <20090721131735.GA18929@freebsd.org> <2e566b9e0907211818k1a52ef7am5c681a6f4ffc868c@mail.gmail.com> <864ot5jy3f.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20090722141756.GQ55190@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/7/22 Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>: > I believe that the nearest action that is quite reasonable and > profitable by its own merit is divorcing base compiler and compiler used > to build ports. Even if this means that we would "only" have different > versions of gcc. On a similar note, has anyone one tried clang + yasm? Cheers, -- Igor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a2b6592c0907220852h4eba5c6bpdebe1d7dcd7ef94a>