Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:32:58 +0200 From: Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystems Message-ID: <4C9DA5AA.4020606@boosten.org> In-Reply-To: <4C9D146C.10009@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4C9D0499.3050908@cox.net> <4C9D146C.10009@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24-9-2010 23:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 24/09/2010 21:05:45, Derek Funk wrote: >> There was a post some time ago someone was complaining that FreeBSD >> still uses and archaic filesystem and not a new FS like ext4. Some >> replied, seeming like a code contributor, with a very sounded reply. >> What is that reply? > > ZFS > > or words to that effect. Linux has nothing comparable. > http://www.osnews.com/story/23416/Native_ZFS_Port_for_Linux :-) Peter -- http://www.boosten.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C9DA5AA.4020606>