Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 00:52:08 -0500 From: Astrodog <astrodog@gmail.com> To: "Kip Macy" <kmacy@fsmware.com> Cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAXCPU alterable in kernel config - needs testers Message-ID: <2fd864e0610082252g3fbdf020s1a450e0233d26488@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20061008131832.O83537@demos.bsdclusters.com> References: <2fd864e0610080423q7ba6bdeal656a223e662a5d@mail.gmail.com> <200610082011.53649.davidxu@freebsd.org> <20061008131832.O83537@demos.bsdclusters.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/8/06, Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com> wrote: > > > > I think MAXCPU should not be great than 32, since we currently define > > cpumask_t as an integer which now should be changed to a bitmap and > > a group of operations like we did for sigset_t. > > This will need to be changed soon for T2 support. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > With the potential of needing to support 128 logical CPUs, I don't think there's any way to get around this becoming alterable. --- Harrison
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2fd864e0610082252g3fbdf020s1a450e0233d26488>