From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 18:05:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9145916A41F; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:05:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA6E43D45; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:05:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9SIEMI1087428; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:14:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:05:34 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E0323D7B6@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> <55E0CA58-AC1E-48E4-A4D0-DDC5829D3690@yahoo.fr> <200510281358.06083.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200510281358.06083.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200510281405.36984.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050919/1149/Thu Oct 27 16:20:09 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: John Baldwin , Mathieu Prevot Subject: Re: ACPI errors on amd64 (sempron) X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:05:53 -0000 On Friday 28 October 2005 01:58 pm, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 27 October 2005 05:39 pm, Mathieu Prevot wrote: > > I simply added > > > > #define ACPI_MISALIGNED_TRANSFERS > > > > in /usr/src/sys/amd64/include/acpica_machdep.h so the intel > > actypes.h is preserved. > > Maybe it is simpler than touching the Robert's / Intel's code. Is > > it right ? > > If so, someone have to commit it on the CVS sources. Can you do > > it before the release ? > > That's probably a good enough fix for 6.0 for now. HEAD can just > wait for the real fix from Intel and the hack can be removed from > acpica_machdep.h in 6.x after the new Intel code is backported. I agree. Jung-uk Kim