From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Dec 8 1: 2:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from red.csi.cam.ac.uk (red.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEFD37B405 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 01:02:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from dr263 (helo=localhost) by red.csi.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 16CdN2-0004UX-00; Sat, 08 Dec 2001 09:02:08 +0000 Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 09:02:08 +0000 (GMT) From: Dave Rufino X-X-Sender: To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , Subject: Re: statefulness in character device drivers In-Reply-To: <20011207122916.P92148@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Poul-Henning Kamp [011207 07:57] wrote: > > In message , Dave R > > ufino writes: > > >Hi, > > > > > >I remember some discussions a while ago about adding statefulness to > > >the character device driver layer. What's the consensus now ? Is it going > > >to be added, and if so, when ? > > > > Uhm, I don't hink I understand your question here... > > Most likely he means a per-open(2) opaque datum that is kept in > struct file and passed to the underlying routines. Sorry, unbelievably bad at explaining myself. Per-open data is what i meant. The reason I'm interested is it would make a full nvidia driver port quite a bit easier. Thanks, David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message