From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov  3 12:21:59 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFDF2C8;
 Sat,  3 Nov 2012 12:21:59 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from crees@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879998FC08;
 Sat,  3 Nov 2012 12:21:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA3CLxiX062894;
 Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:21:59 GMT
 (envelope-from crees@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from crees@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA3CLwHO062890;
 Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:21:58 GMT (envelope-from crees)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:21:58 GMT
Message-Id: <201211031221.qA3CLwHO062890@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: david@nfrance.com, crees@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
From: crees@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: conf/142973: [jail] [patch] Strange counter init value in jail rc
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
 <freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:21:59 -0000

Synopsis: [jail] [patch] Strange counter init value in jail rc

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: crees
State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 3 12:21:57 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why: 
This is a pickle indeed.  Moany people will have used it starting from
1, since the original code was intended to count from 1; see r159072.
However, the prestart code added in r191620 counts from 0.  The patch at
http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/142973.diff makes it count from
0, but still work with a warning if the user has started at 1.  I will
talk to the developers concerned.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=142973