From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Oct 15 16:47:21 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA15832
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 15 Oct 1995 16:47:21 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA15825
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Oct 1995 16:47:17 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id JAA01901; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 09:44:39 +1000
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 09:44:39 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199510152344.JAA01901@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: pete@dsw.com, se@zpr.uni-koeln.de
Subject: Re: Memory upgrade problems w/ 2.0.5R
Cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org, hardware@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>}  when building the kernel, I use optimizations (gcc 2.6.3): 
>}               -O2 -m486 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe

>Hmm, is "-fomit-frame-pointer" legal 
>when compiling the kernel ???

>Maybe something depends on the stack
>always being in "standard" format ?

Only profiling and debugging should depend on the stack frame.

Bruce