Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:43:44 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Brian Somers <brian@freebsd.org>, Ivan Radovanovic <rivanr@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Deprecating ps(1)s -w switch Message-ID: <20090825144344.GO2829@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <78cb3d3f0908250736g2ef52068pb84896eac5a2c45d@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090825034054.2d57e733@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <20090825134447.GM2829@hoeg.nl> <4A93EE5B.8000300@gmail.com> <78cb3d3f0908250736g2ef52068pb84896eac5a2c45d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BuBclajtnfx5hylj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> wrote: > Maybe we should also think about compatibility with System V Unix / Linux > -- I have encountered quite a lot of scripts expecting "ps -ef" to give an > "all processes" output. It would not hurt to review what the Linux folks = did > with their ps(1) -- it supports 3 kinds of options for UNIX/BSD/GNU flavo= rs. In my opinion we should just implement ps(1) as documented in the POSIX Onlinepubs. If it turns out it lacks certain features we want, we could consider adding this to procstat(1) instead. I am of course too lazy to work on this. ;-) --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --BuBclajtnfx5hylj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqT+KAACgkQ52SDGA2eCwWzGACePbRe6ZEmjWncFUc4XYWfZTow BOwAnijcbMM7rF/w/fS/689RFYf82SPJ =671z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BuBclajtnfx5hylj--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090825144344.GO2829>