From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Mar  8 21:01:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA18919
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 8 Mar 1996 21:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA18912
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 1996 21:01:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199603090501.VAA18912@freefall.freebsd.org>
Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA214307769; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 16:02:50 +1100
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: When is 2.2 Estimated to be released?
To: archie@tribe.com (Archie Cobbs)
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 16:02:49 +1100 (EDT)
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199603080159.RAA13621@bubba.tribe.com> from "Archie Cobbs" at Mar 7, 96 05:59:51 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> 
> I'm in very strong agreement with this sentiment!!
> 
> The fact that MS-DOS has a better fdisk program than FreeBSD is shameful.
> While we're at it, how about integrating the booteasy functionality?
> Personally, I miss Linux's LILO very much. Well, actually I still use it
> instead of booteasy.

I don't think LILO is anywhere near as good as booteasy.
For one, there's only a Unix/Linux interface, AFAIK.
Another, is LILO doesn't give a menu (by default).

I can boot everything but Linux with booteasy, across two HD's.
Why do we need LILO ? :-)

darren