Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 23:03:41 -0400 From: Daniel Staal <DStaal@usa.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <11371F4DFBDB053D59EE49C2@[192.168.1.50]> In-Reply-To: <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra> References: <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW%2B4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--As of August 5, 2012 10:29:16 AM -0600, Chad Perrin is alleged to have said: >> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the >> feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first >> I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will >> gonna be the differentiator. > > The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me. Do > you have some benchmarks for that? --As for the rest, it is mine. Particularly in this use-case: From my reading ZFS has a performance hit when used as a base filesystem for NFS. (Largely because it insists on *actually following* the NFS spec, and not taking some shortcuts that are common elsewhere...) Not that I have tested that, even on my NFS server. (Which runs ZFS - there are other excellent reasons to use it, and speed isn't a major concern for that particular box.) Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. ---------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11371F4DFBDB053D59EE49C2>