From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Dec 16 13: 0:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (access-isdn1-33.ds.psu.edu [146.186.43.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A8937B41C for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:00:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (localhost.ds.psu.edu [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fBGKxSK11049; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:59:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200112162059.fBGKxSK11049@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Anthony Atkielski" Cc: "Dominic Marks" , "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: in-kernel web server??? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:48:22 +0100." <001101c18662$3db42e20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: dochawk@psu.edu Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:59:28 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG anthony admitted, > Dominic writes: > > Services should be in the userland, putting them > > in the kernel is just stupid. > I agree. The more userland services you put into the kernel, the less > stable and secure the kernel becomes. > If Linux really does have an in-kernel HTTP server, that gives me one more > reason to be glad I picked FreeBSD. Linux proper doesn't do this. Tux is a massive patch, sold by redhat as a product of its own. hawk -- What part of "non-negotiable" didn't you understand? /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings. Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message