From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug  1 21:06:32 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C12106566C;
	Mon,  1 Aug 2011 21:06:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 17:06:08 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <201107312128.29322.lobo@bsd.com.br>
	<201108011548.03059.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<4E370823.4000707@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E370823.4000707@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201108011706.14163.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Phenom II 975 BE shows 0 celsius
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:06:32 -0000

On Monday 01 August 2011 04:10 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 01/08/2011 22:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> > I have mixed feeling about this because I own a system with such
> > CPU/motherboard combo, too.  I also believe it works well but
> > errata is errata.  If vendor says we shouldn't use it, then we
> > shouldn't. In fact, I am just following Linux as an example here
> > but I have no problem with turning this into a warning message,
> > either.
>
> Let's cut a deal :-)
> If we start using amdtemp for fan control, emergency system
> shutdown or similar, then we follow the strict path.  Until then,
> while we use amdtemp to amuse users with numbers, let's just print
> a warning :-)

Okay, here is the new patch (not tested on the affected system yet):

http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amdtemp2.diff

Jung-uk Kim