From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 19:21:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2EA106566C for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us) Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C6F8FC1A for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freddy.simplesystems.org (freddy.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.65]) by blade.simplesystems.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8LJLeKl007477; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:21:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:21:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Bob Friesenhahn X-X-Sender: bfriesen@freddy.simplesystems.org To: Zaphod Beeblebrox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.90]); Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:21:40 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-fs Subject: Re: Oracle to deny deduplication? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:21:41 -0000 On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > Shortly thereafter I found a nice table (here: > http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/appendixa-1?a=view ) > > ... now notice that the official Oracle table lists version 21 of > zpool as "Reserved" ... this worries me. Is the solution to the > lawsuit against Sun by NetApp (that Oracle settled) that Oracle burys > deduplication? This could be bad for people who unbury it. I think that this is just because Solaris 10 Update 9 is recently released and deduplication is not considered robust enough for production use yet. You are looking at a Solaris 10 document. The easy solution was to simply mask it out. The deduplication code is likely still active in Solaris 10 Update 9 zfs, even if it can't be enabled by it. No worries ... Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/