From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 26 14:24:13 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0B737B401 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:24:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC39743EB2 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:24:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wa1ter@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com wa1ter@smtp-send.myrealbox.com [66.126.108.149] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.23 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:24:16 -0700 Message-ID: <3E346062.4040905@hotmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:25:38 -0800 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20030125 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: Final call for NODEVFS and NO_GEOM options References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > This is the final call for users using NODEVFS and NO_GEOM options! I marvel at my own temerity. I normally would never presume to speak for Bruce Evans but I haven't seen a post from him for many days. I think he would probably object to eliminating NO_GEOM based on his past postings. If I presume too much by speaking for him I humbly apologize. BTW, I have no opinion on the subject but I've been using GEOM and DEVFS for quite awhile with no problems that I can detect. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message