From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 6 22:23:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530C316A4CE; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:23:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D9243D1D; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:23:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AzrkX-0001JW-KS; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 12:26:57 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i276O32a047543; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 12:24:03 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i276O29Y047493; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 12:24:02 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 12:24:02 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20040307062402.GA45853@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200403060051.i260pViX050496@repoman.freebsd.org> <6.0.1.1.1.20040306200019.08ad2900@imap.sfu.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.1.20040306200019.08ad2900@imap.sfu.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Peter Wemm Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 identcpu.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 06:23:50 -0000 On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 08:05:39PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > At 00:51 06/03/2004, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Modified files: > > sys/amd64/amd64 identcpu.c > > Log: > > When faced with a "GenuineIntel", we know what they call it now. Replace > > snide comment with a different one. > > There's a typographical error in the new snide remark: > > > /* Better late than never I suppose.. */ > > One period would be fine; three periods (denoting an ellipsis) would > be fine; but two periods is simply wrong. :-) Actually, some of us preferr it exactly with 2 (two) periods. ./danfe