From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 18 08:17:53 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C785037B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wall.polstra.com (wall-gw.polstra.com [206.213.73.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C816F43FE1
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jdp@polstra.com)
Received: from strings.polstra.com (strings.polstra.com [206.213.73.20])
	by wall.polstra.com (8.12.3p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3IFHodt034139
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jdp@strings.polstra.com)
Received: (from jdp@localhost)
	by strings.polstra.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h3IFHmRZ096678;
	Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jdp)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200304181517.h3IFHmRZ096678@strings.polstra.com>
To: current@freebsd.org
From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030418032146.GF28037@dan.emsphone.com>
References: <20030417211205.GC28037@dan.emsphone.com>
	<Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030417202921.23691M-100000@fledge.watson.org>
	<20030418032146.GF28037@dan.emsphone.com>
Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: new NSS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:17:54 -0000

In article <20030418032146.GF28037@dan.emsphone.com>,
Dan Nelson  <dnelson@allantgroup.com> wrote:
> 
> Right; very few programs actually would need to be converted to
> dynamic.  But John brought up a totally dynamic system, which I think
> would be a bad idea, performance-wise.

No, I did not bring it up.  Max brought it up.  I have already sat
through this discussion at least twice before, so I know exactly how
it will end.  A thread of around 100 messages will build up, and
then finally everybody will get bored with it.  You all could save a
lot of typing by going back to the archives and finding out that all
the arguments pro and con have already been made.  And you could
save me a lot of mouse clicking by TRIMMING THE DAMN CC LIST
thankyouverymuch. :-)

John
-- 
  John Polstra
  John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                        Seattle, Washington USA
  "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence."  -- Chögyam Trungpa