From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 4 13:55:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6547B37B401; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:55:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CA943F85; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:55:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id ECC065309; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 23:55:48 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Kris Kennaway From: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 23:55:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030404212627.GE25811@rot13.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:26:27 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 References: <200304041729.h34HTtVb027430@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030404173635.GA22147@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030404182223.GA36706@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030404212627.GE25811@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha support.s src/sys/i386/i386 identcpu.c support.s src/sys/i386/include md_var.h src/sys/i386/isa npx.c src/sys/ia64/ia64 support.s src/sys/powerpc/powerpc bcopy.c src/sys/sparc64/sparc64 support.S ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 21:55:51 -0000 Kris Kennaway writes: > I was actually referring to NetBSD's different implementation in my > question. Sorry, it wasn't clear from my email. To rephase it, why > do NetBSD have ovbcopy() and bcopy() as separate functions? They don't any more, since 1.4. There are some scattered remains but nothing uses them. In FreeBSD (and 386BSD before it), ovbcopy() has always been an alias or synonym for bcopy(). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@ofug.org