From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 30 12:16:39 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60D71065694
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from s4mmael@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com
	[209.85.218.227])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE2D8FC19
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so4570651bwz.43
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=teOvY70l8tsx0cLyyPjjJGabuTw/AlkWminfAQJjuRM=;
	b=ZqKKxqjLRWoErwOVD+PuPJNE/uKoRyEAvFWJquqYrdCrLMVSXwJz9LSM5aTlrXKDXt
	EAPGn6y9NxqfBKDCurVg1Bwsg5gGOE2tUCuHf/2uMJas93c6L0OUv7/iNnyvQv8Poty9
	c9CT8z1E86OZSyhtjRbyrsd6tUmhdd5nyY0J8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	b=Qtk4k4Sk6Icl5HSgR/TNDjCayX5ByfY6S2QnWoH+hBES+X/rLSTH8upa1u93tI/5Fk
	sG0NO9A456RWdWC/iZGMmbsQLd0eAK90OY/gg/dY+5hSgGqF6RG9Rhbt3J67u2LbbxIG
	uFFW+xmpIBX/lj1HiprVGHqcSjBScLCvXT5S8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.153.215 with SMTP id l23mr5328760bkw.135.1254311398186; 
	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6e38aed80909300449h61d671a3i2281eb875f649eb6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200909290226.CAA28246@sopwith.solgatos.com>
	<689d500ec8c95542a53440b8a23ae773@mail.liquidphlux.com>
	<6e38aed80909300449h61d671a3i2281eb875f649eb6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:49:57 +0400
Message-ID: <6e38aed80909300449p24928d25v2a34d24f309fa808@mail.gmail.com>
From: S4mmael <s4mmael@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Fwd: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:16:39 -0000

> Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think
> this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to read the
> documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which is
> available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame benchmark.
What about FreeBSD 7.2? All debug featureas are 100% off in this
version, but test results are the same as in 8.0
Besides, UFS is known to be not the fastest FS. So, there is no reason
to be suprised.