From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 27 09:50:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83479C8D for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA29915 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r2R9o1xR050737 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r2R9o1qB050736; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:50:01 GMT Message-Id: <201303270950.r2R9o1qB050736@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Michael Tuexen Subject: Re: kern/177362: [netinet] [patch] Wrong control used to return TOS X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Tuexen List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:50:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/177362; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Michael Tuexen To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, marka@isc.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/177362: [netinet] [patch] Wrong control used to return TOS Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:45:48 +0100 It was not done by accident. The returned cmsg_type is IP_RECVTOS = instead of IP_TOS to keep it consistent with the handling of the IP_RECVTTL socket = option. I found it more important to be consistent within the same protocol = family than across different ones. I think that unfortunately IP_RECVTOS is not defined in any standard. Best regards Michael=