From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 21:03:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01C716A4CE for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 21:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452DF43D45 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 21:03:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pieckiel@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:pieckiel@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4E43KcX028041; Fri, 14 May 2004 04:03:20 GMT Received: (from pieckiel@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i4E43KbV020122; Fri, 14 May 2004 00:03:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 00:03:20 -0400 From: "Kevin A. Pieckiel" To: Shawn Webb Message-ID: <20040514040320.GA14750@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mail-Followup-To: Shawn Webb , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20040513171659.GA14716@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <20040513204437.GA14917@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <000601c43940$c4ffb8c0$ad0cbed8@shawns> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c43940$c4ffb8c0$ad0cbed8@shawns> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2.1 panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 04:03:22 -0000 On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 05:19:39PM -0600, Shawn Webb wrote: > I can't tell exactly what's going on, but from that output, it seems as > though it's smbd's fault, not NFS's How can I dive deeper? Or _CAN_ I dive deeper? Can I identify the faulting instruction and determine why it's faulting? At least that will help point the finger at smbd, nfs, or some other bug.