From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 6 17:19:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178E3106564A for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 17:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from tensor.gdynia.pl (tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9C38FC08 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 17:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q56HJCh6069115; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:19:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q56HJCm8069112; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:19:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:19:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20120606182153.3cc2ee07.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20120605203717.5663bdf7.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120605181055.4af65fdb@scorpio> <4FCF0772.8000609@FreeBSD.org> <4FCF1891.9020006@cran.org.uk> <4FCF2521.6090006@FreeBSD.org> <20120606062437.41f48a9e@scorpio> <4FCF352F.7030509@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120606182153.3cc2ee07.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.72]); Wed, 06 Jun 2012 19:19:12 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:19:23 -0000 > Maybe a common marketing and sales model comes from software > to hardware too: You don't actually own the hardware! When > you give money to the manufacturer (maybe through vendors > or retailers), you receive hardware _plus_ a limited set > of rights which you may exercise on that hardware, maybe > for a limited time. By purchasing the hardware that way, > you may even have "implicitely signed" a kind of agreement anyway NOBODY are forced to buy micro-soft software. Nobody is forced to buy a PC. Doing this with PC market will result in larger market share for non-Wintel hardware.