From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 16:55:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CECC16A41F; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:55:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron@daltons.ca) Received: from priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (outbound04.telus.net [199.185.220.223]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD7D43D49; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:55:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron@daltons.ca) Received: from [192.168.15.100] (really [137.186.246.196]) by priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20051018165505.LFYT2663.priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net@[192.168.15.100]>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:55:05 -0600 Message-ID: <43552923.4080106@daltons.ca> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:56:03 -0600 From: Aaron Dalton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Berezin References: <200510180916.j9I9GR35024594@freefall.freebsd.org> <435501D5.4010800@daltons.ca> <20051018141237.GF77678@heechee.tobez.org> <43550429.1020504@daltons.ca> <20051018145310.GG77678@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <20051018145310.GG77678@heechee.tobez.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/87590: Update Port: devel/p5-AI-Pathfinding-AStar 0.03 -> 0.04 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:55:06 -0000 Anton Berezin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 08:18:17AM -0600, Aaron Dalton wrote: > >>Anton Berezin wrote: > > >>>One way would be to actually install one of those as a dependency, so >>>that we get a useful port out of the box. Which one, I am not sure. On >>>the one hand, ::Perl is more portable. On the other hand, ::XS is >>>faster and we can basically guarantee that a C compiler is there and >>>that the module works. So, I would probably go for ::XS as a dependency >>>of p5-Heap-Simple, if that's alright with you? > > >>You're the boss =) I'm just a lowly Perl haxx0r. I just wanted to >>give the user the choice. Whatever you would like to do is fine. > > > Haha. Seriously, though, your opinion is always appreciated. Choice is > good, unless it is forced down the user's throat, IMHO. > > >>Would you like me to update it, or shall you? > > > I'd do it, unless you object. > > \Anton. By all means...it's all yours =) Aaron