From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 10 08:36:01 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026965A9718 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [IPv6:2620:137:6000:10::142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "prime.gushi.org", Issuer "RapidSSL TLS DV RSA Mixed SHA256 2020 CA-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DwQQS1Y7Zz4hPr for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 12A8Zt2f040370 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:35:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 prime.gushi.org 12A8Zt2f040370 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gushi.org; s=prime2014; t=1615365357; bh=Cd+XEoPbNWfF80mB6rj8B7xo0zG98pYh7qPaTVbWjY8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; z=Date:=20Wed,=2010=20Mar=202021=2000:35:55=20-0800=20(PST)|From:=2 0"Dan=20Mahoney=20(Gushi)"=20|To:=20freebsd-por ts@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Guidance=20Requested; b=Dk0CshSzL2hkpmEtf/rNjtxEZo/GLvTq2Ri+Mtaid/b9vESJS+Jrw0buHh2sAssCC 7jOnlYEANdkTlwyj3+UJcspIEAnT6CnOKitkCv0MdoFUQgHJayIK35L4YDHlIZgCUz yELZDmAjry4IKwt+Sz9FxNzn2/8X9eEm81ayl6yR9UQUAgkokpknAfPlRRpVJfqCxK iZv3VGO3Rf31+vGQHvpf1uU72RcITsRAzjQFeiTGYHwaB59+xkljPefaPrCj725WKa JVJcDnldPfNrUl2cAUxSszUETHz+fdkWcEWfkvjfmko/HR1/WYtU4vlPMQ0hWqSnBH ZhdzCl6O0R/Mw== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 12A8ZtJD040369; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:35:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danm) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:35:55 -0800 (PST) From: "Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Guidance Requested Message-ID: <41bae33d-8db5-3cf1-da3e-d177bc504db1@prime.gushi.org> X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0x624BB249 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (prime.gushi.org [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:35:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DwQQS1Y7Zz4hPr X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gushi.org header.s=prime2014 header.b=Dk0CshSz; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gushi.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of danm@prime.gushi.org designates 2620:137:6000:10::142 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=danm@prime.gushi.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.40 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[2620:137:6000:10::142:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gushi.org:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gushi.org,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[freebsd@gushi.org,danm@prime.gushi.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2620:137:6000:10::142:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:393507, ipnet:2620:137:6000::/44, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[freebsd@gushi.org,danm@prime.gushi.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gushi.org:s=prime2014]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[gushi.org:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2620:137:6000:10::142:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:36:01 -0000 All, Mentor support requested. I am the maintainer of OpenDMARC, but haven't done much with the port since being handed it, mainly because development on opendmarc seemed to be stalled. There's a new version of OpenDMARC out, version 1.4.0 (needed a few patches from the github-released version I've got a fresh ports tree made up for it (passes testport, portlint, rclint on at least 12.x i386/amd64) but as there hasn't been a release in several years, and the new release changes a few things, I was thinking about releasing it as a -devel release. Also of note is that it looks like (dayjob allowing), I'm going to be joining the trusted domain project (i.e. "Upstream") to do patch management and testing, so will be able to put out much more regular versions of a -devel port, which would have much higher change delta. What would others do in this situation? -Dan -- --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi Site: http://www.gushi.org ---------------------------