From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 11 22:20:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E872106566B for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E37F8FC17 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1BMK3lL017081 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:20:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1BMK3Wj017078; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:20:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:20:03 GMT Message-Id: <201002112220.o1BMK3Wj017078@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org From: Fernan Aguero X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:32:38 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/122624: unusable minimal installation of FreeBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Fernan Aguero List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:20:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/122624; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Fernan Aguero To: Bruce Cran Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, fernan@unsam.edu.ar Subject: Re: amd64/122624: unusable minimal installation of FreeBSD-7.0 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:19:15 -0300 +----[ Bruce Cran (11.Feb.2010 15:31): | | It looks like a fix was committed just before 7.1 was released. Could | you confirm whether this issue has been fixed? | | -- | Bruce | +----] IIRC I've tried early candidates of 7.1 and the bug was still there. However, it seems like it's been fixed as you say: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2009-March/034435.html I'm now running 7.2-STABLE on this box successfully. Don't know if I'm being too helpful. Sorry. -- fernan