From owner-freebsd-security Sun Mar 26 9:24:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.bart.nl (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8AB37BA1E for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 09:24:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@lucifer.bart.nl) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.bart.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA72590; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 19:24:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 19:24:15 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Installing modules schg Message-ID: <20000326192415.B72480@lucifer.bart.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from des@flood.ping.uio.no on Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 03:38:25PM +0200 Organisation: bART Internet Services B.V. Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -On [20000326 15:45], Dag-Erling Smorgrav (des@flood.ping.uio.no) wrote: >-_INSTALLFLAGS:= ${INSTALLFLAGS} >+_INSTALLFLAGS:= ${INSTALLFLAGS} -fschg From a security aspect this is a common sense change. I am in favor of adding it. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator VIA NET.WORKS The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.bart.nl When Silence cries... Is it what I feel? Or is it what you really long to be..? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message