From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Jan 14 7:16:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2699737B404 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:16:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pittgoth.com (lcl234.zbzoom.net [208.236.36.234]) by pittgoth.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0EFGpD58683; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:16:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from darklogik@pittgoth.com) Message-ID: <3C42F80F.7020306@pittgoth.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:23:59 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes Reply-To: darklogik@pittgoth.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011221 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPP vs. &man.ppp.8; vs. ppp References: <20020114043335.GA24851@hades.hell.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > I've seen user-ppp mentioned in many ways in the FAQ. > What do you all think of the diff at > http://people.freebsd.org/~keramida/diff/29.faq-ppp.diff ? > > The idea behind the changes is that when the protocol is what we are > talking about, we use `PPP', but when the program ppp(8) is being > referred to, we use &man.ppp.8; instead. > > Comments? > > I like, and with no other remarks think it should be replied hehe -- Tom (Darklogik) Rhodes www.Pittgoth.com Gothic Liberation Front www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message